Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Returned, and More on Ethics



Blessings, Courageous Ones!

I return to you after—wow!—a month away from this blog.  My eight day family “vacation” turned into a two week plus end-of-the-A’s-season-beginning-of-the-A’s-postseason-end-of-the-A’s-postseason bacchanal turned into getting sick for over a week due to burning the candle at both ends.  I am still not quite 100% and am slowly getting back into the swing of things.  This means back to my Ethics class!  I’d like to share with you more of my explorations around Ethics and how they relate to my practice as a High Priestess.   

As Dr. Katherine MacDowell writes in Chapter 3 of her book, Ethics & Professional Practice for Neopagan Clergy, “we ‘judge the effectiveness of ministers in terms of the congruence of their beliefs, personal life, and performance’* with the theo/alogical principles of their tradition.  In this fashion, adherents look to their priests and priestesses as models of how to negotiate contemporary life through the maintenance of the core values of their religious tradition.”

It is necessary for a Priestess to show congruency between what she teaches and how she lives her life.  Character traits such as integrity, transparency, thoughtfulness, clear communication, respect, authenticity, and openness, among others, are healthy and beneficial to a community.  On the other hand, character traits such as opacity, prejudice, irresponsibility, lack of discipline, disorganization, selfishness, and others, are unhealthy to inject into a community.

I believe authenticity is one of the most important traits for me, as a High Priestess, to model.  I must be willing to show who I truly am, including sharing my imperfections and what I am personally working on if it will benefit the community.  This is also helpful in keeping my Sisters from placing me on a pedestal—transparency helps to reveal that I am just as human as they are.  Knowing what is beneficial to share with the community and what could be harmful is a fine line that I am still learning about.

I have been in communities where the leadership was careful to never publically show any imperfections and in one case, went out of their way to make sure that adherents did not know the truth of what was happening behind closed doors and in their personal lives.  This lack of transparency coupled with a changing list of “rules” created a lot of instability and drama in the group.

Demonstrating the three character traits found to be most desirable by The Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada (1. service without need for public recognition; 2. integrity; and 3. generosity) and being mindful of not manifesting the three most undesirable traits (1. lack of discipline; 2. self-serving; and 3. immaturity) can be very helpful for the long-term health of a coven or group.   

Dr. MacDowell writes:

In this fashion, to be a minister an individual must have an underlying motivation for service without the need for public recognition—in other words, service for service sake.  Integrity reflects the capacity for an individual to keep their word and maintain consistency; while generosity refers to our capacity to be open and giving of self to others.  In contrast, the three most undesirable traits…:  A lack of discipline reflected not only a lifestyle of excess, but also disorganization in one’s personal life, emotions, and environments.  While self-serving reflects an individual who places their own needs above the needs of their coven or congregation and structures the role of priest/ess to solely serve one’s ego rather than to serve Divine energy that guides the specific tradition the individual speaks for.  Finally, immaturity reflects an inability: (a) to maintain a leadership position, (b) to manifest the breadth and scope of the religious ethics of the specific tradition, and (c) to manifest depth in theological thinking.  Considering this study we can develop a preliminary description of the ideal character of a priest/ess, as follows:

1.    motivated for service, both to adherents and to the divinity of the tradition;
2.    maintains an attitude of respect and integrity—behaviorally manifesting the ethic all are divine (“thou art goddess”, “an it harm none” for example);
3.    maintains an attitude of generosity, authenticity, and openness;
4.    is disciplined, organized, and focused in behavior, thought, and emotional response;
5.    is empathic and sympathetic—oriented to fully hearing others;
6.    motivated for personal growth and deepening one’s knowledge and relationship to the divine;
7.    maintains congruency between faith and behavior, “as above, so below; as within, so without”;
8.    has a mature religious identity; this means the individual feels certain in their beliefs and does not feel threatened by other religious beliefs and is able to translate their beliefs into their everyday behavior.

I find myself in deep meditation about the habits, addictions, and/or compulsions that do not serve me or my community that I still have in my personal life, whether or not my Sisters are aware of them.  What incongruencies still exist?  As the figurehead of the Sisterhood, the community is only as healthy as I am as a Leader and High Priestess.  What personal work must I do at this time to engender more health within myself, my community, and in each individual woman?

I invite you to share your thoughts!

Blessed be,
Lady Jesamyn Angelica
High Priestess, Sisterhood of the Moon

* Gula, R.M.:  Ethics in Pastoral Ministry.  New York:  Paulist Press, p. 31, 1996.